RAM STUDY METHODOLOGY PART 2 OF 3
The use of RAM (Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability) studies in the oil and gas industry has a long history and has become a standard tool to quantitatively predict a production and/or processing facility's performance. Such studies are generally performed in the early design phase through to the detailed design phase and into the operational phase to verify that a facility configuration and design meets the required availability, providing operators and their partners confidence that contracts or production outputs can be achieved.
OPTIMISING CO2 VENTING in CCUS FACILITIES
For Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) operations, traditional Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) methodologies not necessarily provide the desired outcome. Unlike conventional facilities where the focus is on maximising production, CCUS facilities shift the emphasis toward minimising unused or un-sequestered CO₂ (i.e. limiting CO₂ venting over the system’s lifecycle).
To accurately forecast venting rates and durations, two critical inputs are required:
- The CO₂ production profile that reflects the actual volume of CO₂ available for storage (see Part 1 of this case study: RAM Study Methodology, addresses considerations when using production profiles).
- The predicted losses (i.e. CO2 venting) may need to be calculated in a post-process for each individual simulation in cases when the CO₂ production profile is based on a RAM simulation by itself.
Integrated Simulation for Greater Accuracy
In a recent case study, a CCUS facility received its CO2 as a byproduct from a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plant. To predict the CO2 production over the system life, the existing LNG supply chain RAM model was executed. But instead of using the LNG RAM model predicted average CO2 production as a common profile, the study used the CO2 production of each individual simulation as a varying input profile for each CCUS simulation lifecycle. This approach allowed the researchers to capture the inherent variability and uncertainty in the CO2 supply, providing a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of the CCUS facility's performance and predicted CO2 capture and venting rates over its lifetime.
This integrated simulation approach allowed for a more realistic evaluation of the CCUS facility’s performance under varying operational conditions. For example:
- Low CO₂ production naturally led to lower utilisation and venting in the CCUS system, reflecting reduced strain and capacity demand.
- High CO₂ production stresses the CCUS facility, increasing the likelihood of venting due to storage or utilisation constraints.
Benefits of a Monte Carlo-Based RAM Approach
This method of simulation, applying individual production profiles to each CCUS simulation lifecycle, represents a significant enhancement in modelling accuracy. It leverages the strength of Monte Carlo simulation, which produces a large pool of statistically significant data suitable for probabilistic analysis over traditional spreadsheet-based availability analyses. This enables a granular understanding of CO₂ venting probabilities, better risk profiling of system configurations, and data-driven decision-making around CCUS system design and operation. This approach provides a more robust and comprehensive assessment of the technology's potential, ultimately providing reliable data to the clients Net Zero portfolios.
By integrating RAM analysis between interconnected facilities (in this case, LNG and CCUS), and applying post-processing to predict venting on a per-simulation basis, a more accurate understanding of CO₂ capturing and venting behaviour over time is achieved. This advanced RAM methodology not only supports regulatory compliance and emissions reduction but also improves investment confidence and system resilience.
Technical Manager
Bureau Veritas Australia
"The challenge of addressing CCUS facilities varying lifecycle CO2 capture demands with a RAM model was managed by post processing the RAM results, allowing accurate prediction of the system life’s total CO2 venting volume."